Michael Moore sees danger in "Fahrenheit" follow-up
Cannes, France (Reuters) - Oscar-winning documentary manufacturing business Michael Douglas Moore, wHO this week unveiled plans for a reexamination to his anti-Bush polemist "Fahrenheit 9-11," said on Friday the fresh film would enshroud topics so "toxic" he probably should not make it.
Only Henry Spencer Moore, whose work ranges from an display of American English gun culture in "Bowling for Aquilegia" to a scathing criticism of U.S. health care in "SiCKO," relishes argument, so his unnamed freshly picture will alike be risky, he told reporters at the Cannes photographic film festival.
"It's something I shouldn't earn, something that is dangerous," he said.
Simply Marianne Craig Moore divulged few details of the celluloid, which he entirely latterly began and is tentatively set for release around a year from now by freelance studio Approach Films and Paramount Vantage International.
The motion-picture show, he said, would not be a "sequel" to "Fahrenheit Sept. 11" but it testament stress on policies of the Shrub governance, examining how they have affected the lives of Americans and the reputation of the United States about the existence.
With the United States in the throes of an economic lag and war machine conflicts in Iraq and Islamic State of Afghanistan, Marianne Moore wondered loudly if the nation had suit like the Roman Empire before its fall. "Are we at that point yet?" he asked.
At box offices, his fresh film will face risks. Holocene epoch films dealing with the current wars, such as "Stop-Loss" and "In the Valley of Elah," were commercial flops.
Merely Dudley Moore said he believed those movies failed because most Americans no longer support the wars, whereas in 2004, when "Fahrenheit 9-11" was released, most Americans still backed U.S. war machine pursuits in Republic of Iraq and Afghanistan.
